Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_5.mat
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -7.22, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AUGCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.29, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CCUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UCAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.93, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.82, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AUUCUU 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.29, deficit  7.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -11.92, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCACC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.32, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.49, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGUAGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCUUG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -14.13, deficit 12.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GACUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.71, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UACUAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.70, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
AAAAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.46, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
ACGAUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.13, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.41, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGACAU 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAACC 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.13, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACCACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.38, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.39, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACCAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.33, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAACC 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.71, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.16, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UGUGAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.65, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACAUGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AGAGGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.06, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUUGACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGACAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UCGGGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.90, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUGGUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.28, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
GUCCUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.12, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UUAUCUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.11, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.86, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.07, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUGACU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.26, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AUGAUCU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CCUCGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.56, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.46, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.22, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGUGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUUGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.24, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
ACGAAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score     -12.05, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GGAUCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CCUAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.68, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.69, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGAAUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.36, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -12.60, deficit 10.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AAUUAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGCAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGGAAAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UUAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -4.23, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.63, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.10, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.05, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.53, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUCAGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGUUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.23, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAGUUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUCUUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.47, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AAGCUGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.43, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGUUUUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.59, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUUCUCCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGAACGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACACUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.82, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UUUACUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.25, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UACUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.12, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUAAAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.53, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGGAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.88, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAAAUAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.30, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UCAGAUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUCUCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUUGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.91, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
AUUAUCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.63, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGGAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGACUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.33, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUUCUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.45, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUUUCCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.56, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGAAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUGAGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.41, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UGGAAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.03, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGUUUGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
AGAGAUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.60, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGACAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.27, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CUGACGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -11.73, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.79, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UUUAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score     -11.14, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CACGCGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
UUUGUUUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.81, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
AAAGAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.11, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUAACGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.00, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.88, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUACAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.01, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUGAUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.42, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -9.99, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.22, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUCUUAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.17, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GGGAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGAGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.82, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCACUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.45, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAUGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.12, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAGAAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -9.18, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -7.96, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AUCCAAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.54, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UAGAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUUCUCUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.72, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CAAUAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CAGAGCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GACCAACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -13.86, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CAGACUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AUCGUGACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.24, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UCACUAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.30, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GAAGCAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAACCCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCGAUCAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAUCUGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -9.37, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUAGCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.28, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUAAAUAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.13, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGGAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.96, deficit  2.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.97, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGAAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.47, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGACAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.94, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGCGUAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.37, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GAAGAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.50, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAACAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.59, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUCGUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.15, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GGGGAAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUUCGGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.85, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGGUCGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.92, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAUUACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -11.15, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CCAAGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.78, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -7.05, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CACUAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -12.84, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
UUCCAAUCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.55, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGCAAGUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.52, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUAUAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.95, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGCAGUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -11.81, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUAUCAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -11.99, deficit  8.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUUGAAAUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.87, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGUUGAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.51, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGGAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -5.86, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUUGUGAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.80, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCGUGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.13, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CUUCGAUCG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -8.29, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UCUGAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -6.47, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAGAGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.74, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGAACCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.76, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAACGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.80, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUUUUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.51, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGUAAGAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.36, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAGCCAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAUAGGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.22, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGAAGCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAAGUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.99, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAAACCGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGUGGCCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GAAAACUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGCAAUAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.32, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GAAAAAAACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.83, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUAGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.74, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAGUGUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.63, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUCUUAGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CUUUUCCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -11.46, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUGACUACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.27, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGGGCUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUGAUUCUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.86, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUUGGGUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.12, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GAAUCAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
AAAUAGUGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.91, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGUGCCAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAUUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAAAACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGGUAUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.52, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UUCGAAUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.24, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUGUUAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.10, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGGGUUUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.16, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGAAAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.42, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAUUCGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.12, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAUCUCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.89, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CUAUUUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.10, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCACGAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGAAGGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.60, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCCGCCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GAUUUUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score      -9.90, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CGAAGAGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.81, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCAAAUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.20, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACAAAUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.95, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAGCAAGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.26, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGAAGCCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GAUAGAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -11.85, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUAUGGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.37, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCUGAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -12.95, deficit  6.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GGAGCUGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.20, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CCUGUAGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -9.94, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAUGCUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.17, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GUGAUUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.59, deficit  7.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCCAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.33, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAUCAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.04, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGAAACGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.05, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGCAGUAGAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.47, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUUUUUUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CGGUCAAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.94, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGACAAAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.94, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCAAAAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.02, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.73, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUCCGAAAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.42, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GAAUCCGAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.24, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CCUCAGCCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.43, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUAGGAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.14, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGUGAGUGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -15.54, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GAAGUUUCUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.20, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.39, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUUAGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.74, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGACAAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.17, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCGCAAAGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.92, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AGAAGACACAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.99, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CUACGAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.11, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGUUAUUGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.82, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUUGAUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -11.43, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
UUGAGCGUCCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.51, deficit  7.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GCCGUUCGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.19, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GAAGAAACAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUGAUUGCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AGGCAUGAAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.21, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGUGCUCGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.86, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACAGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.40, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCCAGAGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.21, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGUUCAAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.71, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAGAAGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.91, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGUUAGCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.86, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GAUCUAUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.50, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUCGGUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.17, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUGAAAACCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.22, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAUGUCUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUGAUAGGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.83, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGAGACAAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCUGGCUGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CCCUUCUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAAAAUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUUUGGGGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.00, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGUUUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.93, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
UUAAGCAAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.85, deficit  7.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGAAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.88, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCUUUGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.55, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUGUAUUGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.99, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AAGAAAAGAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.27, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUCUUAGGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.64, deficit  6.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGACUCGUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.81, deficit  8.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGGUCACUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.32, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAACGGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.39, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAAAAGAACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -15.03, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CAAUAAAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.21, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.02, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAUGGUCGGUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -15.28, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUUCAAGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.35, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CCUGCGGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.35, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUCCGACAUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.64, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CCUAACAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GUACCGGCAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.10, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGCAAUGAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -12.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UAUCGAUAGCCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.80, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAUCAGCGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -14.80, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
UUGUUAUUAGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.32, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGUAAAUGACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.33, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.24, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UGGCUCUGUGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.42, deficit  7.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GGAUUAACUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.85, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGGCGAUAGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.96, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
AAAUUUAUGUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.64, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
UAAGGAAAAACAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.11, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAUGUUUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.16, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CAUGUCAAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.94, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAAGCCAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -15.66, deficit  8.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
GUGUGGAGUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -12.75, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
AUGAAAGAGUAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -19.84, deficit 12.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUCGGCCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CUGUAUUUCUGGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.75, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.61, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
UAUCAGUAGUUGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93650.1, 15 NTs,       CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG,score     -16.83, deficit  9.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 86.4000	 78.0000	4
5	100.0000	 88.4000	 53.2000	23
6	100.0000	 87.6000	 53.6000	60
7	 99.2000	 54.8000	 15.6000	51
8	 98.8000	 28.4000	  3.6000	46
9	 99.6000	 18.4000	  2.4000	68
10	 95.2000	  7.2000	  0.0000	41
11	 84.4000	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 45.2000	  0.8000	  0.0000	23
13	 18.0000	  0.8000	  0.0000	12
14	  5.6000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  3.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  27 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  38 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  43 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 366 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 368 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 410 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 508 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4500%
Number of models giving false positives is 294 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.60
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.70
